Shakespeare as Political Thinker, edited by John E. Alvis and Thomas G. West. Second edition, revised and expanded. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2000.
CONTENTS
Foreword
Acknowledgments
The Editors and the Authors
Introductory: Shakespearean Poetry and Politics
John E. Alvis
The Unity of Tragedy, Comedy, and History: An Interpretation of the Shakespearean Universe
Harry V. Jaffa
Richard II
Allan Bloom
God Will Save the King: Shakespeare's Richard II
Louise Cowan
Shakespeare's Henry IV: A New Prince in a New Principality
Dain A. Trafton
Spectacle Supplanting Ceremony: Shakespeare's Henry Monmouth
John E. Alvis
The Two Truths of Troilus and Cressida
Thomas G. West
Troilus and Cressida: Poetry or Philosophy?
Christopher Flannery
Nature and the City: Timon of Athens
Leo Paul S. de Alvarez
Chastity as a Political Principle: An Interpretation of Shakespeare's Measure for Measure
Harry V. Jaffa
Prospero's Republic: The Politics of Shakespeare's The Tempest
Paul A. Cantor
The Golden Casket: An Interpretation of The Merchant of Venice
Barbara Tovey
Shakespeare's Hamlet and Machiavelli: How Not to Kill a Despot
John E. Alvis
Macbeth and the Gospelling of Scotland
Paul A. Cantor
Shakespearean Wisdom?
Michael Platt
Shakespearean Comedy and Tragedy: Implicit Political Analogies
Robert B. Heilman
Transcendence and Equivocation: Some Political, Theological, and Philosophical Themes in Shakespeare
Laurence Berns
FOREWORD
The essays collected in this volume proceed from the common conviction that Shakespeare's poetry conveys a wisdom concerning political things commensurate with the charm and vigor that distinguish his artistry. From various vantages the authors have attempted to bring to light the principles of this wisdom. Addressing a range of plays inclusive of Richard II, 1 and 2 Henry IV, Henry V, Measure for Measure, The Tempest, Timon of Athens, Troilus and Cressida, The Merchant of Venice, and the major tragedies, as well as the sonnets, the essays inquire into the significance of politics for Shakespeare's characters and for the poet as thinker.
Most of the contributors will be found to regard Shakespeare as a poetic exponent of the great tradition of classical political philosophy stemming from Socrates, a tradition whose thoughtfulness has recently been recovered and displayed by such scholars as Leo Strauss. In particular, their essays reveal a general sympathy with the approach developed in a work that is the nearest progenitor of this book, Shakespeare's Politics, by Allan Bloom with Harry V. Jaffa (both of whom have contributed to the present collection, and both of whom were students of Strauss). This predominant grain is brought out by the inclusion of some essaysnotably those of Louise Cowan and Robert B. Heilmanwhich cut across it.
The themes explored here concern the nature and limits of political life; the origins of Shakespeare’s understanding of politics in Christianity, Machiavelli, and the ancients; perfect and imperfect statesmanship; England, Rome, and the best polity; the link between individual character and political regime; and the relationship between poetry, politics, religion, and philosophy.
Some of these issues have been all but ignored in previous Shakespearean criticism, and many academic custodians of Shakespeare might contest the propriety of setting poems to answer political and philosophical questions. In some degree, then, these interpretations are provocations, or rather new entries in a continuing controversy.